请教下关于这份关于待机模式的决议
这份决议看的我云里雾里。。。。请各位帮我解读下哦将内容copy 下来贴上，大家帮你还要花金币下载来看？ 观点同上楼。金币难赚 决议内容 Question:
Based on the definition in 3.8.2 and taking into account that there is not always an
stand-by position marked or identified in the appliance operation and there is a need to
differentiate the "off" and "stand-by" circuits, at least in the test of 19.11.2 and 22.46
in the appliance in which 19.11.2 is applicable in stand –by mode according to the
relevant parts 2.
We would like to know if the stand-by circuit include those parts that are energized
when the appliance is in "0" position.
Decision:
In stand-by, only electronic components that are energized in any of their terminals are
susceptible to be short circuited according to a) to g) in 19.11.2.
It was agreed that in terms of clause 19 the meaning of "off" correspond to circuits or
components that are not energized in any of their terminals. 非常百事可乐 发表于 2018-11-6 18:00
观点同上楼。金币难赚
已copy鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅饿 plmijb 发表于 2018-11-6 08:14
将内容copy 下来贴上，大家帮你还要花金币下载来看？
已copy 呃呃呃呃呃呃呃呃呃
页:
[1]
