tassx 发表于 2009-12-22 08:43

W是说14.6条款的

sukaladin 发表于 2009-12-23 08:06

这个问题只能case by case分析。
如果电池盖很容易通过指甲盖之类的东西打开，应该认为这个电池盖的安全方式存在隐患。这就需要评估“the security of the battery compartment cover is adequate.”

判断方式如下：
Compliance is checked by inspection and by the following test.
An attempt is made to gain access to the battery compartment by manual means. It shall not
be possible to open the cover unless at least two independent movements have to be applied
simultaneously.
The toy is placed on a horizontal steel surface. A cylindrical metallic mass of 1 kg, having a
diameter of 80 mm, is dropped from a height of 100 mm so that its flat face falls onto the toy.
The battery compartment shall not become open.
The battery compartment shall not have become open as a result of the preconditioning of
5.15.

如果电池盖很紧，无法用指甲等人自身的条件打开，而必须通过硬币等工具才能打开，则满足这一条中：“The batteries of toys intended for children under 3 years old shall not be removable without the aid of a tool” 的要求。可以认为是pass的。

sukaladin 发表于 2009-12-23 08:09

引用第2楼hncjy365于2009-12-19 13:28发表的:
用手或硬币可以打开的都应是可拆卸部件,标准要求是硬币不算工具


硬币属于工具的。理由是，标准已经有定义如下
tool
screwdriver, coin or other object that may be used to operate a screw, clip or similar fixing
means

tassx 发表于 2009-12-23 08:40

引用第11楼sukaladin于2009-12-23 08:06发表的:
这个问题只能case by case分析。
如果电池盖很容易通过指甲盖之类的东西打开，应该认为这个电池盖的安全方式存在隐患。这就需要评估“the security of the battery compartment cover is adequate.”

判断方式如下：
Compliance is checked by inspection and by the following test.
.......
谢谢解答
若电池盖是用工具锁紧的,则不能用指甲打开;
若电池盖用工具打开后,可用指甲拧紧(稍微紧),电池盖也展现出稳定工作的一面,但是可用指甲拧开?

無心戀戰 发表于 2010-3-26 12:44

同意楼上各位同仁的意见··

哥哥在家 发表于 2010-10-27 17:01

这样的设计本意是需要工具打开的。所以该玩具是需要用工具打开的。即使用指甲可以打开，测试时都是认为用工具。

powerlg 发表于 2010-10-27 17:07

引用第15楼哥哥在家于2010-10-27 17:01发表的:
这样的设计本意是需要工具打开的。所以该玩具是需要用工具打开的。即使用指甲可以打开，测试时都是认为用工具。

同意。
页: 1 [2]
查看完整版本: 这个电池盖是否借助工具才能打开