|
| DSH 588
& s' f5 {- R y! C# N5 q3 ?+ g' i& f" c" g& W3 @
| Verification of main contact position, position of the handle: M) e3 N6 h2 s8 g' s# g
| 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2% C7 p! A4 l. D; x( q
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3)
% N* k/ g1 `9 S( s |
# W$ e$ v3 r! P0 {. R8 NStandard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
) u! W: D4 n9 |! Q2, IEC60947-30 ^$ ], j0 u5 q8 u4 y- h+ p* L
Sub clause(s):2 B/ o& L& q! l4 D
8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and
$ v S& Y/ d% B% ]! ]8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
$ n' \) Z0 I) d3 Q tSheet No.0 ~3 _5 T3 G3 m4 q
DSH 588
, F7 O s1 u$ W! q8 k: J. S, H4 ZSubject:+ V1 }; B# u2 Z8 O4 W1 B
Verification of main contact
* e6 L+ k2 S- b" v& p: cposition, position of the handle- Q( U5 w0 e/ `1 P& ?8 A1 x
Key words:
, a1 G/ d9 ^1 u5 X8 [$ k- suitable for isolation! \: D; S$ t3 N9 z
- indication of contact
% W9 ?/ Y- c/ q+ ]! Q+ Dposition
; ~" F# l7 p$ J) w' V2 t5 e8 g1 vDecision approved3 o5 y, \) Y4 x1 }. T# `
during the CTL Plenary
, v. U& l/ B: c6 v0 O' H& C, eMeeting 2006
* i( U4 T: z: B+ M) aQuestion:
; u; j7 Z$ ?6 c2 @( oVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an- N% q0 x+ S. M* U7 C4 J
additional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to
/ f B' m7 K8 \0 u8 {/ Q$ Xdiscussions6 b r" x5 A3 d! R7 h$ ^+ u
Q1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which |" e5 ^& N: x3 _
is not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of
$ [# E- E, ~& u; N( LIEC60947-1?5 H. K% `& \( @" u# w
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how
0 M4 M1 y; _3 U# B6 b8 Q2 @should section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?
' J% Z( j8 C9 G1 D dDecision:% `% D% a$ J- Q6 o: w/ b0 C- h
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:* a5 J! }# N! O
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
/ {8 z8 }* T# S' P @! f2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a# C7 @$ F% s' H) i
separate position indicator.) o. V+ ?: r4 f# B( l, _+ I
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable
; F( P- w3 K- G5 V- tFor construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position
5 L, q4 L$ `- S8 N4 i' E3 c Lindicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the
3 Q2 n$ h/ m& r& C& i# }# C# G5 S' T" jactuator.8 Q Z" E; p" T* s: E" I& H
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1' E/ T8 l- _0 w5 R) V7 h
5 {, b1 n+ [# q& {+ n: M; Z3 m& W3 f
" P, B2 ^; t! o0 f+ M2 ^
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|