|
| DSH 5880 v& L, t/ `- R8 W% ]1 v
4 Z0 r! u5 n" `# X$ s | Verification of main contact position, position of the handle; _! A2 T: s- s/ Q9 V. X! A+ O
| 8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and 8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-28 T( |% Q: s" L( D
| 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3)
. Z: F% O' Y3 U4 Z* _* h | + Y/ j# U* P" s& e7 H
Standard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-% O9 Z* H5 }8 m1 H! l8 k( U
2, IEC60947-3% S4 v- h X# U# L
Sub clause(s):! Q- G9 D7 ?& U0 l4 e* `
8.2.5.3.2 of IEC60947-1 and5 U( A1 d* F( u* [6 i
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-29 H4 k; _0 M$ Z
Sheet No.
# B# S, V6 ]' h3 fDSH 588
( l& C9 w* Y4 e6 sSubject:
. i$ @' A2 c! w0 QVerification of main contact& d2 Z! \ q6 x8 O: I' j
position, position of the handle
+ {& k) m' O8 `# f: G" TKey words:) V; b% {& w% E `
- suitable for isolation
% o3 l5 b$ [4 u1 ~3 W. S5 B- indication of contact
# l6 n$ h; j# Gposition3 G- K9 U8 I3 u& R
Decision approved
; q& x# Y0 s& L( u% G# c5 P" y. kduring the CTL Plenary
: F8 {* E0 o6 XMeeting 20065 T( b8 v. w2 O. L
Question:
$ c- G0 Q, ~8 r7 d+ W8 fVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an
; d- W3 ~8 C7 z2 x! a% a1 r& yadditional requirement to be verified. With respect to this test, the following two questions gave rise to
; r3 o2 r S, q1 C7 q) Q0 Gdiscussions" x+ d: `! g$ t& V7 g' v- L+ j
Q1: When after the 3F test, the indicator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which
! h! G' j7 ]+ ?/ ais not the tripped or open position as indicated on the product), is this a pass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of
& L+ L) U* A- C6 Z+ {IEC60947-1?9 E4 p7 a8 x/ Q9 W- ^) u2 _
Q2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5 or how
+ d b0 \, M C0 kshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional constructional requirements) be interpreted?
1 X+ m0 p& q5 }; UDecision:2 j# {4 O ?! }' o4 Q) G
There are two possibilities, depending on the features of the MCCB:+ D7 X8 U' ?7 p* @
1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
. i. p2 X& \- e! W2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a
; F( ?# B1 k4 f9 S/ b) qseparate position indicator.0 N# n" A7 e$ e9 N( z# {
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable- u) P' I7 @* A' u) F! {
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position( h2 D+ D. A7 q* y
indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the position of the
/ j' Q& e7 U9 s1 F1 {: q& W6 Z5 oactuator.
$ a: K& L4 V! hRefer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1: a- J0 t1 }6 z) o) _% ~
* h9 j" I- A4 O4 {
6 J7 c( z, r5 Z" ?" x( K5 _- @
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|