|
| DSH 753
; \$ @( b) \% n7 f! n- g0 C
3 S& c1 m+ v2 K3 ]5 p | Capacitor discharge voltage measurement
5 }- L2 ?4 A* j0 C }9 M | 9.1.6 (IEC60065/2001) 6.10.3 (IEC61010-1/2001)0 l% s1 e% K, z: W% ]+ i
| 61010-1(ed.2) & 60065(ed.7)* Q4 \$ f9 v5 T D* X4 A
|
\7 d1 \5 h' t/ \2 W" k1 ~Standard(s): No. Year- b) f% n5 H; o! {- T
IEC60065/2001, B+ T8 j9 [+ c+ u& s( M' b; V
IEC61010-1/2001
8 e$ n1 T3 A/ K4 o4 v! i. UDSH 0753- Z5 r7 b: j( Y; D/ T( l
2009* u% o4 q# J" R; @
Category:% L6 v$ n' Q! _- i) Q# { \1 P
TRON, MEAS
. E3 o2 ]* y' y8 a/ C4 f' gSubclause(s):1 Q1 E1 ]6 |6 x0 {4 T5 a
9.1.6; C$ a. X" _ l3 E0 l, Q
6.10.3 j$ x5 Q* O: c L
Developed by:3 ~0 @- F. W5 I& L2 g! y0 }* y
WG4, ETF2, ETF3/ y' O+ B% H! C- n
Subject:
1 C- \% ?4 ?# l7 nCapacitor discharge
/ h6 ?9 a. k/ C/ X. n0 z, k: Tvoltage measurement( t; R# p% a9 ]2 A1 ?
Key words:
/ e1 X/ j. ]8 M5 g- Plug discharge
8 l3 Q) O9 T7 A4 f9 _9 C1 g- @# d- Capacitor discharge
, v& x1 e. t- K$ J- Shock hazard; V" `- i- M9 P1 y$ ~6 z
Approved at the 47th CTL
5 q4 }# d! e8 }2 _4 Z4 WPlenary Meeting, year 2010
1 \# k( }- R1 }$ v7 q2 S0 @4 m0 {Question:2 O8 D8 D% ]/ Y6 L4 c! [" G
The standards referenced include a test commonly referred to as a plug discharge or capacitor
( G" a7 P" O7 @discharge test that involves disconnecting the product under test from the mains and/ k1 T% E/ [4 u: P
measuring the residual voltage across a capacitor(s) at a specified time. The intent in each of9 { ~, F! R. c
the referenced standards is the same – measure the maximum voltage obtainable at the time \! q' n- A. q* u2 D# ~
specified.
0 B4 Y9 k& J! D( R/ d, I(1) Each standard has a slightly different description of how the mains disconnect is made, but$ I- `) R \( Z. Q9 S4 |
the intent is to disconnect at the highest voltage possible in the AC power cycle. With the
( O; n' U- O/ u6 A5 ?5 wadvent of electronic voltage sensing switches, it is possible to disconnect at the peak voltage in
/ @( E+ H/ z+ z3 y9 nthe AC cycle. Using this procedure seems to be within the intent of the standards and would: E- U' J( v" W+ g
result in more consistent and repeatable results. Is it acceptable to perform the test this way?
' {+ @' |) j+ f2 K! `% h# p+ ^(2) Good laboratory practice dictates that the voltage should be measured with a high input
( `3 M, H" J$ z+ K$ w5 Cimpedance voltmeter. For this test, some standards require the use of a voltmeter with an input, a7 Q8 i6 D2 T- D
resistance of 100 M 1 ± 5 M 1 in parallel with an input capacitance of 25 pF or less. For more
: F* b( G5 v( V/ j0 F2 x- Zconsistent and repeatable results should this type of meter always be used for this type of test?6 S" _; T5 m4 r$ F
Decision:
, ]0 ^* ~2 s; _3 B0 l/ d- T(1) Yes, this method should always be used for these tests within the CB Scheme.
2 ^! ]3 e: ?5 N: t(2) Yes, a meter with the stated input impedance should always be used for these tests within2 F; c! h% n* D7 l
the CB Scheme.
! Z7 D y# p) N3 ~ T
; w: ^4 `6 a0 l! I
. \ U" c6 m* o% C& R1 [: i |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|