|
0 f# q2 ^% W c
/ m: A" i5 q8 J/ ?: B2 l
| Identification
* ^. ~; |% r* L+ D2 o# L | 5.1.2: L% ]2 }: v& F% W* L! @3 V6 Q
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2+ W# u- q" b: ^. I! c; Q, ? t8 O
|
" \0 W& I7 T) x/ A8 n
) l- s7 Z) n, E& @2 `- ?Standard:
' n2 B; j) [( `2 RIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
0 J% B0 J6 Z, I% E, a! z. O:1995
6 z9 U2 ~) d# k1 @4 ?% fSub clause:; J) U1 f: W" W* c' C
5.1.25 a8 A( A& Y) j
Sheet n. 362
! @. ]" O \) N6 VPage 1(1)
0 [" ~6 r' q! n+ F) o5 @+ OSubject:
' j0 m4 a; Q+ J8 s6 D) AIdentification& ]! ?0 s8 `% ` T O. Y: y c
Key words:
) X7 S9 J( j/ D) N- Manufacturer’s name
: X1 B* ?, n$ Q5 v; r+ {: U- Trade mark' l4 C0 x* Q$ ^* L% s% A8 ?1 ~
- Agent/Supplier
& P9 w) f1 o* {' K; uDecision taken by
$ w/ Z% A* x2 C4 E `ETF3 and confirmed
7 B K) X+ V* l1 t! @6 ?by CTL at its 38th
% Q) E8 D( B, k% f9 L- Emeeting, in Toronto9 K9 l1 ^4 j1 D. W* V8 p. r m
Question:1 z- F# O8 _" E* z7 k
Manufacturer's name or registered trade mark. Is manufacturer's agent/supplier name9 s# j/ @7 O0 y" Q
acceptable as an alternative for identification?
# m0 y- K, O. g. RDecision:
8 R# B4 s: J6 i" }9 FIn the absence of a definition for “manufacturer” in IEC61010-1, it was decided that only
{: H2 |! v5 y, H/ B9 zmanufacturer’s name is acceptable under this sub-clause.) y& x4 A4 N. {
1 H) C2 V, v7 y$ D3 b
8 b# R4 F& @6 G) [; G" q% V0 A% Z6 g, i# x
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|