|
+ s. {9 |8 U# r, h1 y8 {# u
Standard(s)- (year and edition):+ \7 d, Z" N- S# G
IEC 60601-1:1988 Ed.2 Am1+Am2
1 z9 J9 @7 f6 s3 N: ?" ^0 M- QSub clause(s): 0 @8 b$ N. D( D& r% ?. T$ {# ^
Sheet n°: DSH-412. `, q) F9 g0 C, b. Z7 i- [' [/ b
Subject: Detection of fault
" W' X: I. U, k4 G1 fKey words: SFC, detection, fault
/ p) K5 W: ?) OConfirmed by CTL at its 39th meeting, in Cologne
4 _6 c5 Z7 m, W$ pQuestion:
7 V# q4 x* F# V) G1 s* O1 j5 J: S* uShall a fault which remains undetected be considered a NORMAL CONDITION (NC) or a9 a8 D* g0 z$ e! O" b; x" D
SINGLE FAULT CONDITION (SFC)?4 j0 L; @3 G$ s; h7 r+ n1 F: B$ w
If every fault is considered as SFC, regardless of whether it is detected or not, the- c3 [- a i9 ]1 x' q: r
consequence will be that there is no protection required against situations where an
( O: k& N9 e# I3 k5 w L4 [' @5 i- rundetected first fault is followed by a second fault which may cause a SAFETY HAZARD.
& I; t, @) C2 r% D- ?! o2 NDecision:$ [1 @/ g3 X, G; l+ {* [1 }
If a fault is not detected (for example by periodic inspection, maintenance, auto test, etc....), it
' R; B" @# Q9 l& n5 u! {shall not be considered as a SINGLE FAULT CONDITION." Y7 S" \% ?% g i# W# r: d
Time periodicity for the detection of fault depends on the risk analysis
* r% Q2 O' l7 F' Q( j5 K. ~2 [- f. N, t J
3 u7 e& n7 G4 O, P' A/ r2 P
5 E. T! M( V. ?
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|