|
' z4 r+ N2 v5 l! M Q
3 t% M: C% T# N | Integrity of clearances and creepage distances
0 g5 w9 H, t: N9 y! `" [, e | 10.1
- S* b5 Z- i" V7 F% J | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2" T, B& z3 S) A# p8 f
| 5 S0 X3 c2 L) U9 h+ w
! y8 F* j% P1 \
Standard:
8 C4 y( {# n1 J, b+ w9 @; e8 N) VIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
! k1 G; `# D$ S:1995, S* l' ? a) k
Sub clause:
# x i4 B4 J: w1 n10.1$ h1 Y7 r0 E# V# r# T& Y
Sheet n. 337
6 P5 j- e% N- A8 YPage 1(1)4 h" o/ R! B% ~2 i4 u: X2 _' d
Subject:
( v5 C3 O* `/ C* q# G$ g. ?Integrity of clearances and
8 V( Z8 W5 P" p/ Ecreepage distances
0 P4 @( a# {9 U# c* W. z9 oKey words:
8 Z$ s/ ^& o* x% {5 L) z, q( l- Clearances distances8 I9 B4 N& |6 ~1 a5 P
- Creepage distances
2 q! U- N% s$ ]. }7 A$ b5 {Decision n. 23 taken at9 r# f" [2 G; O/ v( c% Z
37th meeting/2000
5 b2 G: k! \9 d& jQuestion:1 C) c$ Y! Q; |* \+ t
Strict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work.
8 c+ z, I, w. p/ u6 m8 LHow is this clause considered for compliance?
3 @: b6 I W; lThis question is from CTL.
2 z0 T8 ~3 _! J& [) Z: Y4 |Decision:& P" m2 ~$ w0 R! o4 e1 D1 o) R5 G
See Explanatory Notes$ z# G# r% K1 I( I4 h0 Y- u
Explanatory Notes:
# Y! S. [( I7 g, QThe compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to
) c2 }1 ^& r/ \ensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then) ^8 P' t! E7 i6 t: y ?/ _5 o
further tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for
' {: g( i% y6 e7 j, b" bthe creepage and clearance distances.1 q, t; n% Q( N* s* ?
0 ~$ s3 S) p3 ^) M6 _! d( Y/ k$ j0 r5 U, o/ Z
# J( L% j" ~) ~: U: r) S+ i8 y$ v
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|