|
9 I8 m/ d8 y, A0 Y
- l l) h% o0 @) j
DSH 3376 m. v2 o) X" Q1 _; u( v! k) K; g
| Integrity of clearances and creepage distances
7 ?! T$ u" } f( C1 h* l | 10.1
+ p6 @4 D* [7 P1 k+ W8 B | 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2
' v* T8 s) l* x! Y1 `6 X) e" G | ) m! e: W& s4 o$ K' M4 ?% m
; U% j# Q0 x# K1 j7 M5 kStandard:
/ w. ^# v n" {# X) `- gIEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
) K0 T- o4 e1 O2 r. q9 w% @:1995: X6 K0 ? e3 G7 r& T4 d4 C
Sub clause:
2 K Q- { U7 k' _3 ^10.1
- I# E* v2 ~) r! dSheet n. 337
$ d0 j" O; n. j, C2 t: a6 ZPage 1(1)
' |' k+ o1 r( |+ u uSubject:
" z2 K/ C% p9 E$ `' \3 t2 aIntegrity of clearances and
, O2 s# P9 s0 Q5 c! g% tcreepage distances
5 v. y+ c, N( Q1 A7 e6 p, rKey words:
, l+ ?2 @& G5 E) ?# U- Clearances distances
4 E& g; J7 w4 G8 e' f4 T- Creepage distances
' t2 @" e' d2 t* tDecision n. 23 taken at
# G( L- H) ]; a' y$ O% T6 ]: S37th meeting/2000
, b) e3 G- e! v& iQuestion:" b0 R5 S) p9 ^+ _6 W" J5 X
Strict interpretation does implicate a lot of test work.
! c& o6 E8 U; A( X( \How is this clause considered for compliance?0 ]* V3 t( g' F4 ?- B U" |
This question is from CTL.4 F/ U- ?/ c4 J/ L3 r" m+ |
Decision:8 }' K& ~6 V, D& d) s; S
See Explanatory Notes
& G/ ]# `' q1 ^! T' t! q7 G* m1 xExplanatory Notes:4 U, W" P: B" C
The compliance requirements suggest that, in case of doubt additional tests are required to
' i- i B0 V# e; q. T. {3 V0 b$ Uensure the integrity. Where examination of the data and the test results cause concern then
( f: h7 [( G/ J* h, T. gfurther tests are needed at 40°C ambient followed by measurements of the concerned area for
& N( Y8 u: t) Z+ h2 lthe creepage and clearance distances.
( e: }# R9 i( `; @3 [9 E4 y
8 v8 U" q: q! o3 f0 e7 @( t3 x7 z& V3 P5 V2 b2 B: Y+ T
0 R& ]9 U0 ?& ^, O6 e. R; ~# V- Y7 C* D |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|