|
| DSH 437
) Y# g5 n8 q9 c9 e
- n* y) y& u3 k | Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m* O+ c5 t. ^- T+ t
| 9.12.139 s4 v3 W7 G$ r4 @# t
| 61009-1(ed.2)
( ~; g7 D: H- @6 e; K% Z3 H | * |( m5 r/ _% f; w; ~5 p6 f4 g& I' e
Standard:. h9 U* R0 D' h/ }) x
IEC 61009-1 (1996-12)
7 o' C0 c3 j' b5 y* f) qSub clause:, a3 y2 {1 l d0 f% Z
9.12.13
$ [5 ]7 J: H5 ]: {( z/ V; sSheet No. 437# @6 W( V: O5 }- Z, q1 ?& ~
Subject0 Z8 s* p: J* @
Verification of the rated residual; A; P* U5 v% r/ ?/ S
making and breaking capacity IDm/ L; g' ~* p: v
Key words: Confirmed at CTL
& O: B. i4 G2 X2 s39th Meeting7 U. ]7 W3 t) M% K8 g2 X
Question:
! ~+ g1 r! a1 s9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall
4 Z; q& t1 u( b* J# }( Ynot be used.
2 I: q/ r5 S% S: Z5 a9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.
9 X. l7 K8 B/ D q& G t: l9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance
2 u* z' ?/ s8 FZ2 to be used.5 ~5 M5 V% w: `1 [1 t
According to these figures the following inconsistency appears:+ ?" i$ J$ U3 Y0 E( U
For a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
- v% Z$ e$ Z, A- c7 _7 g/ Umaking and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
% i1 }/ g1 G( n/ b, v( x dFor a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
5 Q3 X0 B& l W. t' p a1 a3 R+ u9 pcapacity has to be tested at 400 V.
! h. r0 h2 z$ |9 s! ]# x. m! pFor a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking& l, q/ ]. j; }. j- g
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.2 L: n4 R# {2 q* N' p
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for3 j. K: J" ^" c: C$ m/ {2 I+ m8 Y
400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.! D, P& K0 S8 n5 v/ w
Due to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
8 V4 Q$ f/ c. j$ f4 U0 Lthe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
4 h3 d$ w3 v) A/ n230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.# G% Y% B$ C: H9 {; h
Decision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:5 k* g! P T! z# r
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:/ `8 c* k/ b# Q
SC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3: r3 l5 a5 s I7 Q0 y8 y
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
! n3 O3 d) r+ JWG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
; `" X0 b5 z- n+ ^important decision.
& E% c( V* B5 l+ T* g2 u1 kTherefore the following statement was drafted:2 v; A r& c* @# I0 O) s
20 g" C' o. c1 k) b" T: I) n
Decision to be forwarded to CTL:
4 F0 [% f! ?* S9 s. A" ~/ jIEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
) L9 o5 `: I d. b2 C9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
u6 z' X, {7 Z" Z; b; Emaking and breaking capacity IDm.
/ X; {3 A3 ^1 e+ I" P0 vThe test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the1 D' x3 I4 v$ j4 R* I
line to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will0 p& q, t# f' f5 n6 A( L
be included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
) [/ m6 q. n0 dThe revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.# q" O8 B0 L2 p0 d5 R% L! \+ M. x
$ W4 [/ h$ k. p/ ^+ @
! S2 P7 b) [+ l0 W0 o0 m |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|