DSH 437 Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m

小米

广东安规检测
有限公司提供：

小型摆管淋雨试验机

IPX5X6X7喷水试验机

1000L恒温恒湿箱

各种试验指现货

可程式恒温恒湿试验箱

水平垂直燃烧机

自动卷线器试验机

耐划痕试验机

各种灯头量规现货

灼热丝试验机现货

GB1002插头量规

IPX1-X7淋雨现货

IEC61347/UL935镇流器热试验箱

灯具防风罩

IK冲击试验机

UL498插头插座量规

VDE0620插头插座量规

稳定性试验台

家电温升测试角

针焰试验机现货

热电偶焊机现货

家电125mm试验指

E12灯头量规

无绳壶无绳电熨斗插拔寿命试验机

IEC60335试验指甲

DSH 437 8 x- Q' I# r$ e' d 2 S9 x( |6 Y, Q+ w9 \7 y, I

Verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity ID m 2 }  J, Q  n( s7 F% h  f

9.12.13

61009-1(ed.2) 4 W  k) T4 _3 x2 Q4 ]

Standard:
IEC 61009-1 (1996-12)
Sub clause:
7 s; t3 p! d% ^( i9 I1 n3 h9.12.13
& S2 _4 l) M' i- L& [0 T( x9 e2 ?Sheet No. 437
6 p" y: P: J3 p2 N8 [3 A% BSubject
9 L+ k. ~- i' z8 o0 ^# \* }Verification of the rated residual
making and breaking capacity IDm
& x) o: s5 _% M) i! _Key words: Confirmed at CTL
0 j2 i/ r7 L- T* L0 H6 |39th Meeting
+ L# ^9 p+ {) w: k& w' N- a1 ^  HQuestion:
9.12.13.1 refers to the test conditions prescribed in 9.12.1 and states that the impedance Z1 shall
not be used.
9.12.1 refers to the conditions in 9.12.1 to 9.12.12.
0 B( D/ o; v8 C. `2 s9.12.2 and 9.12.7.4 require the test circuits according to figures 5 to 9 together with impedance
4 o5 ^. {1 s' J8 q' C, K# Y: UZ2 to be used.
/ C0 w" u# H+ G$ G0 ^/ [( H0 FAccording to these figures the following inconsistency appears:
0 B  j* I( g  Z/ R7 J* e& tFor a single pole switch (with two current paths) normally rated for 230 V, the rated residual
$ Q0 o6 j' W$ }1 ?$ h" }3 V7 p6 o1 Cmaking and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
4 }& Y- F5 j0 m' @For a two pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
) L7 l- R* \% }3 ?) ^capacity has to be tested at 400 V.
For a three pole switch normally rated for 400 V, the rated residual making and breaking
capacity has to be tested at 400 V.
For a three pole switch with four current paths and for a four pole switch normally rated for
400 V, the rated residual making and breaking capacity has to be tested at 230 V.
5 C& i1 u0 I, s/ U5 EDue to the fact that the purpose of this test is not to cover the special fault conditions in IT-systems,
+ K( R, d: A/ |5 m' ~the test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be
230 V, independent of the number of poles, and the relevant figures should be corrected.
Decision taken at the SC23E WG2 meeting in Nice, October 2001:
Extract from the minutes IEC SC23E_WG2_006:
$ g3 I' B8 M- s, L* p* l; SSC23E_WG2_010 request from Austria to update 61008 clause 9.11.2.3
The proposal made by Mr Bachl was considered justified and accepted. During the meeting
WG2 decided that laboratories and certification bodies should be informed about this
" `: z* J/ l; l' i! [5 Mimportant decision.
Therefore the following statement was drafted:
' E! m6 Q' n& ]4 b2
6 y9 O2 B; y* X! @Decision to be forwarded to CTL:
' j+ _7 y7 {) K) ?9 CIEC SC23E WG2 decided to correct the inconsistent test requirement in IEC 61008-1 (1996-12), subclause
9.11.2.3 and in IEC 61009-1 (1996-12), subclause 9.12.13 - Verification of the rated residual
# T6 x" j5 L( Q! Jmaking and breaking capacity IDm.
The test voltage for this verification of the rated residual making and breaking capacity should be the
9 y' D  ?2 K1 N% f4 n- E: Rline to neutral voltage, independent of the number of poles of the RCCB or RCBO. This correction will
$ L0 I% V# g0 L* ~/ O0 G% T- ^be included in the next amendment or revision of IEC 61008-1 and IEC 61009-1.
) z- b1 ]$ D( @6 E0 n9 g: LThe revised test circuit (fig. 7) proposed for the standard is attached.