|
; M6 j" u) X+ pQuestion:: O3 u) c$ B! @) U
Reports from different Testing Laboratories and clients expose essential differences in interpretation and testing practice between laboratories and/or Certification Bodies.
0 h9 r7 c7 r6 tActually, the practice of one Certification Body is now being a market factor.
4 p/ x' S- {0 _4 IBased on above concerns we ask for clarification:& J& G$ D9 z) Q/ Z& Q: t
1: Shall Cl. 19.11 be strictly followed or can solutions given under 2. be accepted.
0 l! {+ m t1 T' j( h2: Can any of the decisions (made by OSM/EE) be accepted?# F0 G& i6 f! U) u4 U- L8 ]: A
- A: VDR’s across the mains are accepted if the VDR is separately certified according to IEC 61051-1 or according to CECC 42200.1 v, t8 }$ q; M2 j3 `* N* e( n
- B: VDR across the mains with a protective device to guard against short-circuit is acceptable.% V, J( s0 D+ t1 V7 L
- C: If A and B are acceptable, should, because of the fact that VDR’s may burn or burst during life-time due to an increasing temperature stress caused by increase of leakage current with a number of switching cycles in the VDR, a thermal interrupting device on the VDR connected in series with the VDR be required.% G# C: z5 ?3 r! x5 z- P+ }
Decision:
8 U5 [4 a2 y, R& J( Q. g9 {1. VDR’s are not short-circuited if they are used within their manufacturer’s declared specification, when tested according to Sub-clause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(1991).
. V0 G$ Z5 l+ N! f D2. VDR’s are short-circuited regardless of compliance with IEC61051-1, when tested according to Subclause 19.11.2 of IEC60335-1(2001).% K3 M8 ]' j2 Y1 l/ M4 |
' ?* }6 e$ Q0 q m
. k$ I9 z* f# l1 T; {# @) ^' g/ r |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|