|
| DSH 281/ I: M u4 U: o) ?
2 ~. e8 \# K5 v4 f7 q" P& w | Open circuit of conductor of PCB during tests of clause 19$ k( I* ?/ W, U! L' C
| 19.11.2! C0 d* \) ?7 y, a3 ~8 Q0 @. a5 e
| 60335-1(ed.3)/ N" o/ B4 j {
|
7 I U3 |' o) H5 ^Standard: IEC 60335-1, Ed. 3.0 Sub clause: 19.11.2 Sheet n. 2816 s3 b* E* g1 `' d7 ]3 S. K7 ^" O* a
Page 1(1)4 b$ Q; F# a% z' G1 Y* Y
Subject: Open circuit of conductor$ H6 ~. E" T9 F5 r+ c, e4 \
of PCB during tests of clause 198 |7 y. T# X" U \3 Y
Key words:% J3 ], R, }9 f4 B4 V/ `0 t
- PCB
; Y! W8 L+ {1 j9 s" ~! W( WConductor
& {3 d: ~* y1 m* DDecision n. 20 taken+ k1 G) a6 [; Y- y4 s- d
At 36th meeting/1999( `; D, q" N5 C. u. k6 W7 E
Question: When conducting test of sub-clause 19.11.1 one conductor of PCB blow up; e8 K2 A0 m2 s ~
Taking into account that:
0 m+ w+ N( b+ Z% L9 t8 E- the material of PCB withstands the burning test of sub-clause 20.1 of IEC 65,
6 ]' ]& o& l: c X3 E5 s: K- there are no loosened conductor which reduces creepage distances and clearances
" z! P3 W# @- h% Z, Wbelow the required values
; \" P! M5 ]2 x7 c5 M- when the test of sub-clause 19.11.2 is conducted with the open-circuited conductor8 y* {7 @5 s$ B& H: g9 `- X
bridged, an other part of the PCB blow up,
% T0 ?3 K& `0 O4 l% T! `: aare the requirements of sub-clause 19.11 fulfilled?) @4 F0 u: F0 W8 ?7 I, K. g
Decision: The circuit complies with the clause of the standard, if the conductor of the" n0 N4 h# R( h6 [6 c. L2 {
PCB is considered as a intentionally weak part of the circuit./ {1 v3 H7 S' B+ w2 H' P
This can be verified by performing the test on another sample and verify that the
- g5 t) G6 @* ]) ^! X8 nsame conductor blow up (according § 19.1 6th paragraph), and if the conductor is
2 {$ b- F: k, j& J0 f$ {defined by the manufacturer like a specially designed weak part.
3 l8 y- w( f5 Q# n0 E/ }' W' I- @) {
& j+ d" M, Y! o; D( j8 \; F2 t1 n
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|