|
| DSH 281
9 j B, n8 x* Q4 a l0 {' L, e) x$ N; n5 z) P& z) ]4 o+ O5 n
| Open circuit of conductor of PCB during tests of clause 19. D( f9 U, E: k+ z
| 19.11.2
/ y0 e9 b' m7 ?: E/ t& C! c# s! V | 60335-1(ed.3)
2 |) i1 U5 p2 j/ e6 o | $ L; \2 I% Z5 c [
Standard: IEC 60335-1, Ed. 3.0 Sub clause: 19.11.2 Sheet n. 2818 g/ l2 E' r( O. U a3 Z. c- f
Page 1(1)
' }2 t }% ]: [) }. vSubject: Open circuit of conductor& R# {& [, I" `, `+ n" `3 R7 ]# |9 J+ _
of PCB during tests of clause 19; }' y/ O/ f+ m3 R& R! ?; W
Key words:& t# ?: y; _, H+ {6 F9 T% ]- P' F7 d
- PCB
' z8 [& m- @* ^" ~3 C' u7 x; A9 ~; y3 ]Conductor
8 m0 E' D' G% x$ w1 XDecision n. 20 taken+ D" E" Q, `; O
At 36th meeting/1999
# D! X4 {3 X5 T0 g, ~Question: When conducting test of sub-clause 19.11.1 one conductor of PCB blow up$ c# ~7 c: t! B g3 b2 ]4 X; a
Taking into account that:% ^ ~* X( N9 s& G
- the material of PCB withstands the burning test of sub-clause 20.1 of IEC 65," {6 a2 {8 D" V! \
- there are no loosened conductor which reduces creepage distances and clearances
3 F- z+ F A w7 [below the required values
$ ?! e, p9 B2 F7 M) ~& J7 [7 O' |, c- when the test of sub-clause 19.11.2 is conducted with the open-circuited conductor
" E/ {8 `& e2 {. Z- Rbridged, an other part of the PCB blow up,5 @6 e7 S3 K( R; k# Z3 _
are the requirements of sub-clause 19.11 fulfilled?. n4 ^, i/ ~& j5 ~, _
Decision: The circuit complies with the clause of the standard, if the conductor of the
" J0 K; R. ~; ^+ q2 `) g$ T2 uPCB is considered as a intentionally weak part of the circuit.
- m3 k$ y( D+ g9 XThis can be verified by performing the test on another sample and verify that the
; t! [ ?. |6 m% f5 d+ Q" ?same conductor blow up (according § 19.1 6th paragraph), and if the conductor is3 d0 L/ g3 v- C$ ] L5 j) u
defined by the manufacturer like a specially designed weak part.8 N% @) e( E' [
5 g d- O5 z8 H' Q7 Z1 k
" b ]2 h! k; j |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|