|
| DSH 252A) g; `/ c8 `, `4 C; t/ r
% l5 K: I: H. ?" u8 j
| Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment+ n7 i0 L* J# D f2 o) h L
| 2.2.10 and 26.1/ T+ a- N3 \5 Y
| 60335-1(ed.2)
5 N' D/ K0 z1 o8 g! g | 0 n8 j! L0 { ^3 F) `
Standard: IEC 335-1, 2nd edition ' P% G% n3 s \+ X& x% d6 Q
Sub clauses: 2.2.10 and 26.13 W. _/ s% _( ?9 L v6 ]4 F/ w) C3 B. C
Sheet n. 252 A, P& a4 S+ q% H. \% j5 k
Subject: Allowance of crimp connection for type M attachment
0 _: D5 u% e: d; QKey words:3 ]) }; ~9 C. |5 ^
- crimp connection
0 z9 L( u2 e7 n- n. \$ {, o: ^0 s- type M attachment
2 b9 J- g" t! j- U0 V" BDecision 13 of 34th meeting/1997
$ e0 o( r9 r9 a2 x H, L8 wQuestion:
( |8 V# A2 x! W$ @Subclause 2.2.10 states that crimp connections are allowed for type M attachment,1 ~, X+ P; \0 w2 |5 _
and
% J- v+ G$ p. |( d$ N! rsubclause 26.1 specifies that “For appliance with type Y attachment or type Z- K; U8 a6 k* W/ D" ?
attachment, soldered, welded, crimped and similar connection may be used for the
6 n L3 U$ v8 M8 rconnection of external conductors” f7 C$ G' h8 B5 R6 B0 T
Is there any inconsistency between the two a.m. subclauses regarding the allowance
v, h) f+ S7 Z, u6 Tof crimp connections in type M attachment?& a. }5 Y( `; p+ @% {
Are crimp connections acceptable for type M attachment?
6 X* f- A% X( ?4 N5 Q( `0 gDecision:
0 b4 c! p! ^, X0 X8 b* N- There is no inconsistency between subclauses 2.2.10 and 26.1, as subclause 26.1
* A0 u) G, K8 s" Q8 a/ krefers to types Y and Z attachments and not to type M attachment.
# E/ k$ C- j- D, Y+ ]/ R: s& D# L$ q: t6 ^- Crimp terminations forming part of a type M attachment are acceptable (see* R8 @6 F1 t: D3 @: d* k/ ]4 d
sketch below).
" B5 | G6 z( l6 U0 a
& V' X- F' y; v9 y, c$ \ |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|