|
| PDSH 854
# \0 |* Q3 U7 Y: K& {/ _3 O9 {8 ]8 t
| Screw connections
) q v( v- f9 M | 4.11.3& ~# |$ P! R6 i, w
| 60598-1(ed.3);am1 & 60598-1(ed.4);am1 & 60598-1(ed.5) & 60598-1(ed.6);am1 & 60598-1(ed.7)
4 ^% E+ z5 D- ? |
/ J% x6 l7 j/ M1 {Standard(s):
+ ~6 o. y+ H7 \5 x# G+ EIEC 60598-1 All editions% R( E7 f3 @8 H) ~- d
Subclause(s): 4.11.3
9 S1 @6 z& f) m# u7 ~, \No. Year PDSH 0854 2010, x* f8 {: A% J! A! m5 n/ b
Category: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM
! b2 T6 B# j6 E6 G$ nSubject:9 @, @7 W) s7 `: l7 b
Screw connections
5 ]. I* y w+ [$ C9 v3 s% nKey words:
. q- |* K4 D5 e8 l/ _- Small “spikes”* l1 [; G% j& i' v+ V- _
- Locking of screw connections7 \. W S8 K+ l2 ~3 A8 V: |
- Ballast
6 ~5 v! ]: u$ Q2 X) ETo be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012. C, ^ U% V7 O6 F( y) F
Question:& Z+ ]3 ?2 r7 M7 q+ k* F
Are two small “spikes” for locking of screw connections of a ballast acceptable?2 ~% ]. O7 U) v1 e: C* Z3 }% H# P
Decision:$ K3 Q; l! V) @, H
The solution is acceptable. Each case has to be judged on its own merits.
# I0 Z* E1 X0 P8 [& [. h `8 u% D. G L- v
, X% p0 B! d( b: P( j- M ~" U+ j: B" g2 y. D8 l
6 X' S: o3 o$ l7 j
5 C% @% K3 [% D7 {+ C7 }: m8 m" ~0 X
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|