|
| PDSH 8541 }8 N* H, M8 G1 K0 ^0 {+ O) O* O) P9 O8 U
: F( `/ q: R' _% W4 k7 P$ N | Screw connections' _9 F; o5 J2 {
| 4.11.35 b$ X+ y% m( E- R3 K; U1 X5 v/ p
| 60598-1(ed.3);am1 & 60598-1(ed.4);am1 & 60598-1(ed.5) & 60598-1(ed.6);am1 & 60598-1(ed.7)% {! x2 c; z! d
| : P$ Y# M, h8 P# [' ]) M
Standard(s):
0 G8 F) \0 q# t4 k; IIEC 60598-1 All editions' ]& Z# b$ |& l" W# ]
Subclause(s): 4.11.3$ n, k9 a& B, }4 V
No. Year PDSH 0854 2010
: F& Z' }8 b# K9 Y% J9 iCategory: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM. @! s# ^4 J7 l, v6 B
Subject:) _3 }4 S3 D6 Q& D0 x, H) h
Screw connections
! ~: X! U: m% E% ^Key words:! t, y: K4 p! k5 w6 E1 Y8 F
- Small “spikes”' w, K% ^ n4 {& ?4 r
- Locking of screw connections
# R4 ~3 i8 ?5 J9 Y$ R- Ballast/ b6 S0 u) I, I9 A$ c7 f/ Y
To be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012) I% M6 `0 ^( `# M% G
Question:
, n! c: A2 i7 I0 e. G7 o) iAre two small “spikes” for locking of screw connections of a ballast acceptable?
+ R, X" y1 {4 D! i7 QDecision:
* ~8 P. O- T \$ h$ T& K JThe solution is acceptable. Each case has to be judged on its own merits.; h, ~) h1 d7 o3 ]
( s% T* a, y- H+ R7 ~* D1 s {' V
! e+ O6 D! i1 v* `) f9 c5 R9 p4 p0 R9 F+ `* t' ?5 L
6 C, d5 j9 ]# F7 z2 Q& \) p
& Q8 A: `& A2 F
! f0 v5 M5 f9 v- B4 y
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|