|
| PDSH 1011
! `' j: x5 T k. ~5 Z! z' P | Annex B
$ Y G7 k* e0 ?( G1 }, S: o+ p% u' s | Annex B
2 g; C. H1 V% D | 61347-1(ed.1);am1 & 61347-1(ed.2);am1 & 61347-2-9(ed.1);am1;am2. \( V2 n! T5 d( R
| 8 \+ B) Y4 V2 N2 O; i
Standard(s):
+ g3 a0 }. ?6 UIEC 61347-1
: m! S( z3 q6 q# Q+ QIEC 61347-2-9 All editions
9 r7 P/ |/ e0 V9 L; xSubclause(s): Annex B
1 W/ z% m; h% H3 u! `; M8 \ mNo. Year PDSH 1011 2010
$ g! a' [- a% n! W' C& K! yCategory: LITE Developed by: ETF5 OSM/LUM
: e* U8 {( R$ L# }* fSubject:) U6 l8 H. t% k* z
Annex B
$ H# O* I x6 Q: {+ X. HKey words:5 Z& W0 L5 w+ h$ V
- Discharge lamps
/ z" o7 _/ x6 Y% N, Y* \: Q/ }- Thermal protector
1 X- Y7 P0 K1 u1 w1 ~) A$ j- IEC 60730-2-9
6 W% \4 C& ?/ }0 I; {/ f. F- STo be approved at the 49th CTL Plenary Meeting, in 2012
C9 s9 n& V# y5 t/ qQuestion: r- w0 k% u4 o5 b+ I$ n8 v
Would it would be acceptable that a thermally protected ballast for discharge lamps (according to Annex5 S, B0 A- a ~' \& o- u& A
B of IEC 61347-2-9), include a thermal protector control according to IEC 60730-2-9 instead of a thermal
4 Z& p5 G# W: n; S2 @' S. ], Hprotector in compliance with IEC 60730-2-3?! v3 M3 {5 s/ T0 L8 z
Decision:3 b3 `8 B& h" X) _. s$ b8 D
No. Reference to IEC 60730-2-9 is not acceptable.
" P7 [* l/ P% E5 x+ ]$ y0 O+ Y4 O! A/ U+ X9 G+ a
' ^& X* @. T* V% L9 ~ |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|