|
7 z% S, W6 J: Q
3 u" D9 F+ s ~- H3 XDSH 753
2 S$ S( r1 S0 X3 r; T K |
| Capacitor discharge voltage measurement
% l/ A1 O F* b, a$ T: y0 z3 x! z | 9.1.6 (IEC60065/2001) 6.10.3 (IEC61010-1/2001)
: M, b/ t& Y$ i; n( i7 K, S4 o. z | 61010-1(ed.2) & 60065(ed.7)
; p0 o( Q0 F) F% M% Y" D | 3 z- ]7 M4 P! Q0 W) D# ^
' O( s9 b/ ` x: i! w
Standard(s): No. Year, m; S% p% E% l' Q
IEC60065/2001
0 g: l3 t. L4 o& ^" d) r. sIEC61010-1/2001
6 O2 n" x" J# F% Z) L2009 DSH 0753 TRON, MEASCategory:
2 a! k: u- h5 {/ U% \, S4 i- [! ?9.1.6Subclause(s): ( T* t. s% ~7 S1 |; y
6.10.3
% U8 P3 C/ s+ H- vDeveloped by:1 h$ w. V0 `6 U2 y. {2 O) K
WG4, ETF2, ETF3
' V+ e- f/ S* RSubject:
1 w3 U5 ~( x/ [! \- t0 ^4 _& BCapacitor discharge
! W" n2 ]1 G, N' E9 Kvoltage measurement2 ~7 K" |( E9 [, s4 y
Key words:( `+ T/ y o9 X. E2 r3 V' j
- Plug discharge% `* ~6 B4 c6 W
- Capacitor discharge5 P" P8 j- b# j5 b. V% f6 T3 C
- Shock hazard9 t; X: q1 W5 q: {* B" j2 i
Approved at the 47th CTL
4 k' q0 R% H' \& @Plenary Meeting, year 2010' f, `% b0 L$ [
Question:
5 m# V* P8 }4 a" U/ ^# G% A8 {The standards referenced include a test commonly referred to as a plug discharge or capacitor* T+ L1 M9 O6 y6 ~
discharge test that involves disconnecting the product under test from the mains and
9 V0 n# o# F- U5 N4 x8 t+ imeasuring the residual voltage across a capacitor(s) at a specified time. The intent in each of; U+ h' A# o4 m
the referenced standards is the same – measure the maximum voltage obtainable at the time8 }3 \5 ^( W4 K+ I) b) P- g
specified.9 _0 O' l( y3 S8 F
(1) Each standard has a slightly different description of how the mains disconnect is made, but+ [) A$ x6 Z/ S" {# j9 `' z, r. t$ Z
the intent is to disconnect at the highest voltage possible in the AC power cycle. With the& N& X e4 I: M* u* b# B( G
advent of electronic voltage sensing switches, it is possible to disconnect at the peak voltage in
2 I9 |5 k: k5 M% Z1 @4 B+ X Dthe AC cycle. Using this procedure seems to be within the intent of the standards and would
. r- C9 C3 A: y3 ~- uresult in more consistent and repeatable results. Is it acceptable to perform the test this way?( \( K8 V6 M- Q
(2) Good laboratory practice dictates that the voltage should be measured with a high input2 R' F3 ^$ q V. b6 m
impedance voltmeter. For this test, some standards require the use of a voltmeter with an input
! n7 X! e# O( ?/ \9 z- Y/ |) ?1 @% F% Uresistance of 100 M 1 ± 5 M 1 in parallel with an input capacitance of 25 pF or less. For more
% V( w$ M* H% x6 L5 vconsistent and repeatable results should this type of meter always be used for this type of test?
. `* l; B: V% e, @. L b4 D; V8 ]Decision:# S; c; d& z/ M& ^5 x- {1 z# P- O( m
(1) Yes, this method should always be used for these tests within the CB Scheme.
2 S, \1 E& x! j(2) Yes, a meter with the stated input impedance should always be used for these tests within
& K) `$ i' y' _3 Y7 O" ithe CB Scheme.
- i5 q4 v! D2 L" M# G+ y0 x: G" L) @5 U: e
- J! W% L' u1 N" b4 V/ f5 E6 l
- J8 M& p/ a# e1 B |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|