|
' N0 {+ s0 y; T, {9 v) D4 Q
) ?1 P5 o. F! U2 H, d7 K: ~
| Flammability rating of internal wiring$ f, z6 q2 P' b* \: u- c( z5 h/ S- P
| 9.2.1 a)
: f# o. c/ @+ k9 x% x | 61010-1(ed.2)
3 S2 X1 {) b9 c8 }% [ | * q2 T7 S" n, {( V
$ w9 p9 N% e0 D7 v6 |- `$ Z& U
Standard(s)- (year and edition):
& k* N d7 I9 m' \, F6 @. U* Z1 Q2 CIEC 61010-1, ed. 2, 20013 _, G" V$ |5 H2 M) L9 P" C
Sub clause(s):% ]) a. {! _! Q, l8 _
9.2.1 a)
& ~: o: r( y7 ?$ K7 e& NSheet n°: DSH 6183 B- V5 o+ H5 e4 ?# j. e
Subject:
1 Y- p# k( p/ W! EFlammability rating of internal wiring' ]5 L/ N/ k+ o+ U9 f$ |. F
Key words:
; L% P# j) P! H/ \( J6 d- {Wires, flammability,
8 e) E: O& O2 B" J7 S* Q& {Decision approved by the CTL Plenary meeting 2007
7 P4 I$ v% \9 u; RQuestion:
/ x0 w/ j+ m& b$ Q2 [Insulated wires shall be equivalent FV-1 or better. Wires are not generally tested and rated according to FV-1. It is not easy to establish equivalence between different test classifications/methods if you are not involved directly in such testing procedures." z8 z" |% V) M0 ~
Wires typically are rated VW-1 or FT-1. It is unclear if these flammability ratings are equivalent and thus acceptable (Same problem exists with IEC 60601-1 ed. 3) L" m) }. Q2 E: Z) P3 M
Decision:; o n% `3 n! ^6 H, F$ J
Wires rated e.g. VW-1 or FT-1 or according to IEC 60332-1-2 are deemed equivalent and can be accepted.
4 ]$ ~& R4 M7 I1 n6 [3 M9 h6 J( C
! c! z+ f x `; p6 R4 v& U" ]& k& |8 s9 X1 g2 L- p. h4 }
- j+ q E8 u; g, R1 W- V# e' d) e" w$ v |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|