|
|
0 K8 ?! L. c/ B- x- j
( X" F; _; @% _6 A- s* J
 DSH 369
1 W8 T* y4 z1 U9 u( b) N& {" | | Comparative tracking Index
3 _7 f' G6 w4 k) ^- S | Tables in Annex D0 v# Q/ x _' k3 u }
| 61010-1(ed.1);am1;am2* X- d5 o. X% `. j5 p" G8 B
|
& U5 L* f- h8 y) z5 v% P- @: d z w6 O/ P
Standard: ^, q) A2 o% ~/ \- L! c$ g- C. f- J
IEC 61010-1:1990 +A1:1992 + A2
4 s/ @* [2 n' r/ {1 V:19958 G! }- f8 m3 S7 e4 B+ U5 U8 A
Sub clause:
, |- ^4 q; x+ x4 A3 c* OTables in Annex D
1 D* U" |2 x. G8 T( s/ V# e. `' G, L$ zSheet n. 369
1 Z% A+ O/ J$ d3 `' I mPage 1(1)$ S# `. k+ O! e. u* z
Subject:
! z2 h4 F7 U/ hComparative Tracking Index
, B5 f$ u t! m" a B& Z9 c0 \Key words:
4 ~4 {: o( d) v) `/ z- CTI values
$ f% E1 Q0 B3 F4 N; D- Manufacturer’s claim8 d: }, y+ w2 N* H
Decision taken by/ r( n8 T7 k% ?5 e( ~6 J+ w7 f) `
ETF3 and confirmed3 m8 `) Q$ k0 ^
by CTL at its 38th/ G \ t2 n4 q" N- {2 M
meeting, in Toronto
4 A& w+ a6 s* d! TQuestions :
( b. q$ _4 Q( d' M9 o& j1. Is the manufacturer's declaration regarding the CTI values acceptable by Test Houses?
5 `0 j. l( F V# M4 x) o8 K6 {2.Is a single test for the CTI value acceptable?: p X5 Q) p f/ T; G+ z
3.Which CTI value is to be used when no value tested or declared, for example for PCB's?
8 |/ \/ Y- e* z, S& XDecision:
1 P7 s5 s- {& D( e) X1. The manufacturer’s claim is not adequate and must be backed by an independent test
% a% o8 j; V: x, J! Mreport/certificate from a recognised test house.3 x0 q' ~3 T: u
2. No testing considered necessary if the material is approved and fit for purpose. However, K1 m: O+ i5 r2 Y# @
if not approved than single test is not acceptable.( [0 r' I+ Q( R. f" H) s
3. The least favourable value, for example CTI value of < 100.- K0 D9 ], {1 k& T
- i3 t" Z# H2 `
% ]: ^; i: l z7 W0 W5 Z( Y5 K) a
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？注册安规
x
|
/2 
|关于安规|小黑屋|安规QQ群|Archiver|手机版|安规网
( 粤ICP13023453-10 ) 
窥视卡
雷达卡
发表于 2012-9-18 11:53
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡