|
| DSH 5976 r1 z- }) {2 I
* K+ i/ i) E6 g
| Verificaton of main contact position, position of the actuator0 e0 ~) }" Z/ Y# q/ ^
| 8.3.3.9
( M& ~% C# N8 w! w | 60947-1(ed.1);am1 & 60947-1(ed.2) & 60947-1(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3) & 60947-1(ed.3);am1;am2 & 60947-1(ed.3);am2 & 60947-1(ed.4) & 60947-1(ed.5) & 60947-1(ed.5);am1 & 60947-2(ed.1);am1 & 60947-2(ed.2) & 60947-2(ed.2);am1;am2 & 60947-2(ed.3) & 60947-2(ed.4) & 60947-2(ed.4);am1
) x3 g7 l2 F) ~% R' c: f |
4 V0 I H- f% p; i3 f. yStandard(s): IEC60947-1, IEC60947-
8 l& M5 Z a; y7 G9 }' c2! v, H! b) h4 V; o
Sub clause(s):, E$ B& L3 G4 t- s
8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1 and5 P4 M+ t- b3 h/ W
8.3.3.9 of IEC60947-2
6 e0 M# X2 u- Q* d6 ]DSH: z& d# y# `& V, r! i/ E/ F6 a
597" R0 r" I0 a! F/ S. u6 P) [9 N \
Subject:: M: Y9 a. m1 Y- d1 {6 t
Verification of main contact
+ A( l8 R$ Y" z% K9 B7 |$ |3 f. Pposition, position of the actuator! }% _, f/ u* m! _3 c& o
Key words:
: @( {, F$ g7 z' ~) Z) V) O- suitable for isolation
& d# W& S# f! A: T$ c8 \' b* O! j/ j- indication of contact/ c, v5 E! j# J* r! c& D( {2 J2 P# \
position( \' B0 p2 Q5 @) v+ O
Decision approved by6 y8 i: D3 c) e1 o2 s7 T( ]5 L5 R
the 44th CTL Plenary
$ z; j( a' B0 G$ R8 h& s+ `- Fmeeting 2007
/ r0 }2 S* f5 a' MQuestion:
2 B Y+ O! A) w/ B5 g6 dVerification of the main contact position is conducted only on products suitable for isolation. This is an
9 N! L+ L, g/ R# S+ [. _, n- Iadditional requirement to be verified.
4 K+ K! b- a- f7 O# H4 }" k: ~# MQ1: After the 3F test, the actuator comes to rest in a position between the trip and open position (which is& s- v6 ^; {' M; U( ]5 l( D
neither consistent with the tripped nor with the open position markings as indicated on the product). Is this a
$ v. U9 K6 V( Wpass when tested according 8.2.5.3 of IEC60947-1?
5 I$ [$ v. n3 y! k, U0 QQ2: If the answer of Q1 is yes, is this in conflict with the general constructional requirements of 7.1.5? How
# U8 c6 ~( \: t' j- P0 R0 xshould section 7.1.6.1 (additional (constructional) requirements) be interpreted?
+ X! n! \4 J- v4 w: C+ _" TProposal:
7 P! a# K/ f5 s$ \: @+ MThere are two possibilities, depending on the features of the breaker:
1 E8 c+ E3 P0 {' G: L' ~% P1) The indicator is the actuator, and it is the only position indicator, or
: K1 w7 o1 e! _! M2) There is an actuator that may show the operating position, but in addition there is a
$ O, x- L% D' s: z: oseparate position indicator.0 { x% V5 C* b
For construction per item 1, this result is not acceptable w7 V& ~: d% {8 T. ]
For construction per item 2, the result described is acceptable if the separate position( |5 r- G# g8 o
indicator unambiguously shows the closed position, irrespective of the rest position of the, Q% U* {& y1 B( n* E5 L
actuator.% o9 {! _2 Q2 t
Refer to IEC 60947-1, Clause 7.1.6.1
* v7 d8 v K8 j/ O
6 E) N" F; u+ g& e# M, E$ W# P4 D4 T& u- B0 c- J3 M
0 J* L p/ P+ z; e( T4 f |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册安规
x
|